I finished reading "Terrestrial Energy: How Nuclear Energy Will Lead the Green Revolution and End America's Energy" by William Tucker today. For anyone who knows little about energy, nuclear, etc (like myself) this was a very good read.
The premise of the book is that we can really "go green" and end any man-made contributions to global warming by using a hybrid approach of nuclear for base load and solar for peak demands. To defend his premise, he explains the problems of other forms of energy (specifically why they can't be used for base or peak demand). For me it was very interesting to learn about all the forms of energy out there and why (when you look at it realistically) they won't work.
My favorite parts were on nuclear "waste" and the chapter called "France and the Future." As far as nuclear "waste" goes, there is no such thing. All biproducts of nuclear power generation have other uses. 95% of the biproduct is U-238, which we can recycle into plutonium (non-weapons grade) and put back in reactors to generate more electricity. The remaining biproduct can be used in medicine (we currently import 90% of our radioactive medical isotopes from Canada since we don't recycle our own nuclear "waste").
Now, the truth is not all of those isotopes are economical to recycle, so there will need to be some storage until it becomes more economical (either through better technology or greater demand). But, he claims that 50 years of biproducts from nuclear power generation which we can't recycle could be stored in a building the size of a football field. Contrast that with the enormous amounts of carbon-dioxide, sulfur, uranium, etc which is released into the atmosphere through coal power generation.
The title of the last chapter "France and the Future" intrigued me, how often do we Americans look to France as an example for the future? Well, in nuclear power generation, they seem to be leading the pack. 80% of France's power is generated through nuclear. They store the biproducts which are not economical to use yet under the floor of a room the size of a basketball gym (25 years worth of generation and they haven't filled it yet). They have also reduced the demand for uranium by 30% by recycling (which means less mining). If we really want to combat air pollution, global warming, etc, it seems like France might be a good example.
The book is full of facts (with citations), historical data, and solid evidence that nuclear is the way to go. If you want to know more about energy generation, I'd strongly recommend it.