I really liked it and laughed my head off. While Santelli might seem a little over the top, he raises some interesting points. Does the government really think that we are so self-centered that they have to force us to help others? Do they really believe that we don't care enough about our neighbors to help them? I personally believe that the majority of Americans care about their neighbors, friends and family. If my neighbor were struggling financially, I'd love to help them. What bugs me is being forced to help. What's the commandment, thou shalt not steal unless the government says its ok? Just because its legal doesn't make it moral.
If a neighbor can't make his mortgage payment, isn't it in my best interest to help him? Instead of the government forcing me to help, they should encourage me to help by making it easier for me to buy my neighbors house and then let my neighbor continue living there while paying rent to me. They could do this by lowering taxes (property, sales, etc). Doesn't that sound like a good idea? And if I can't afford his house, why can't two or three of us get together and buy our neighbor's home?
Finally, my last thought on the stimulus/bail-outs that have been going on. In a podcast I blogged about recently the point was made that some believe that what is currently happening in the economy proves that capitalism and a free-market doesn't work. When in fact, what is currently happening proves to me that it does work. Those who have made bad decisions, companies who made shady/risky deals are living with the consequences. Or at least they would be if the government weren't meddling in the system. Is it really the government's duty take all risk and consequences out of life?